These are not the first things I consider. If I do need something like a key or time sig, I can drag that into the score when I'm ready. All I need is a one step button for a grand staff, and automated filing. This could be fully automated and make more sense. I don't need it, and it's an obstacle for me to have to fill out. For me, the last item I consider is a title. All I needed to do was put a pencil to the staff and I could fill in whatever i wanted, in any order that I wanted. The next thing is the time and key signatures. The title is the first thing you encounter when copying. How do you go about composing?Ī transcription has the benefit of a completed score for reference. So what is that? The development of the New Score Wizard does not seem to be informed by the latest processes. But you do not seem to be a fan of 21st century common practice. Marc - You are a composer? I think that is what you said. I alert you that we are in a transition from transcriber to composer software, so expect many issues to arise that come from composers and for different ways of thinking about this program in the years to come. Transcribers can still preserve the works of the past in the traditional system. ![]() What are the advantages and disadvantages? What groups does one or the other option benefit? I think such options would give Musescore a competitive edge over even the commercial products out there.Īnd, no, I don't expect the masses to pop up say "Oh Yeah!" in unison. To be able to view and work with your music in an alternative universe, yet with translation between those worlds. For me, the inclusion of different systems is like the choice of fonts. ![]() To put my interest in context, Steve jobs once said that he thought that the Microsoft Word program was competitive because he designed it with a selection of fonts. How long would it take to develop an interface? Can the two programs (Musescore and Clairnote) be merged? They are both open source, but someone said that it's foundational system, Lilypond, is not compatible. Clairnote might be a good system to get children started on reading and writing music. The modification to the staff is only slight. The Clairnote system seems to do this, with it's more accurate distancing of pitches on the staff. I'm kind of intrigued by the idea of addressing foundational weaknesses in our system and how it might be improved by degrees. Stockhausen made a strange departure in notation. A transcriber's nightmare? A composer's delight? I know that our notation system has gone through revisions since it's inception.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |